Safety ratings have become a crucial factor in car buying decisions, especially as Indian consumers grow more aware of crash test results and international standards. The recent Global NCAP assessment of the Maruti Suzuki Ciaz has sparked debate, as the popular midsize sedan managed only a 1‑star rating for adult occupant protection and a 3‑star rating for child occupant protection.
The Crash Test Results
Global NCAP tested the India‑spec Ciaz equipped with dual front airbags, ISOFIX child seat mounts, seatbelt pretensioners, load limiters, and Electronic Stability Control (ESC). Despite these features, the sedan’s performance was underwhelming:
- Adult Occupant Protection (AOP): Scored 20.86 out of 34 points, translating to a 1‑star rating.
- Child Occupant Protection (COP): Scored 28.57 out of 49 points, earning a 3‑star rating.
- Bodyshell integrity: Rated unstable, with the footwell area also deemed unstable.
- Frontal impact: Head and neck protection for driver and passenger was good, but chest and knee protection was rated weak.
- Side impact: Marginal to adequate protection, with chest and abdomen protection weaker in the side pole test.
Why Did the Ciaz Score Poorly?
The low rating highlights several shortcomings:
- Lack of side and curtain airbags: Without these, the Ciaz could not be tested for side pole impacts.
- Unstable structure: The bodyshell and footwell area failed to meet stability standards.
- Limited chest protection: Weak chest scores significantly reduced the overall rating.
These issues reflect the limitations of the Ciaz’s older platform, which has not been updated to meet evolving safety expectations.
Comparison With Rivals
Here’s how the Ciaz stacks up against competitors in the midsize sedan segment:
| Model | Adult Safety Rating | Child Safety Rating | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maruti Suzuki Ciaz | 1 star | 3 stars | Affordable, fuel‑efficient, spacious |
| Hyundai Verna (2023) | 5 stars (Latin NCAP) | 5 stars | Modern platform, strong safety kit |
| Honda City (2023) | 4 stars (ASEAN NCAP) | 4 stars | Balanced safety and comfort |
| VW Virtus / Skoda Slavia | 5 stars (Global NCAP) | 5 stars | Robust MQB‑A0‑IN platform |
Clearly, the Ciaz lags behind rivals that have invested heavily in safety upgrades.
Implications for Buyers
For prospective buyers, the Ciaz’s 1‑star rating raises important questions:
- Value vs. safety: While the Ciaz remains attractive for its affordability, fuel efficiency, and spacious cabin, safety compromises are hard to ignore.
- Family concerns: With only a 3‑star child safety rating, parents may prefer rivals offering stronger protection.
- Resale value: As safety awareness grows, cars with poor ratings may face lower resale demand.
Maruti’s Broader Safety Challenge
Maruti Suzuki has faced criticism for lagging behind in safety compared to rivals. While models like the Brezza and Grand Vitara have achieved better scores, budget‑oriented sedans and hatchbacks often fall short. The Ciaz’s poor showing underscores the need for Maruti to prioritize structural integrity and advanced safety features across its lineup.
Final Thoughts
The Maruti Suzuki Ciaz’s 1‑star Global NCAP rating is a wake‑up call for both the manufacturer and buyers. In a segment where rivals like the Virtus, Slavia, and Verna are achieving 4‑ and 5‑star ratings, the Ciaz’s performance highlights the risks of relying on outdated platforms.
For buyers, the decision boils down to priorities: if affordability and fuel efficiency outweigh safety concerns, The Ciaz remains an option. But for those who value peace of mind and long‑term reliability, competitors offer far stronger safety credentials.
As India moves toward stricter crash test norms and consumer awareness grows, manufacturers like Maruti will need to step up their game. The Ciaz’s rating is not just a number—it’s a reminder that safety should never be compromised.